Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

It seems pretty obvious that gentiles shouldn't make Berachoth on any Mitzvoth (their 7 aren't exactly ritualistic, and they were not commanded in the rest of ours). But are there any Berachoth that they may/should say? Perhaps Nehenin (foods, scents) or Shevah (praises)? Maybe Shehehiyanu on certain occasions? Maybe even a judge who presides over a case (since they are commanded to have a justice system, which he is implementing)?

share|improve this question
It seems pretty obvious that gentiles shouldn't make Berachoth on any Mitzvoth So women also shouldn't bless on anything? (If I remember, that's actually how Sefardim hold) – b a Oct 7 '12 at 18:12
That's not exactly right, but assuming you're generalizing, there's still a difference between Jewish women, who are part of the Kehillah that was commanded collectively ("Asher Kiddeshanu...VeTzivanu") and gentiles, who were never part of the collective that was commanded. – Seth J Oct 7 '12 at 19:30
@ba Moreover, it's harder to say that the gentiles were 'sanctified' in getting the 7 mitzvot, unlike women who do have an element of sanctification though mitzvot. – Double AA Oct 7 '12 at 19:55
I can answer that there are brachot they can say, but I don't know what any of them are. Does that help you? – Double AA Oct 7 '12 at 20:12
Well JNF beat me to it. I'm still not sure which brachot are included. – Double AA Oct 10 '12 at 21:03

We are instructed to answer Amen after a Bracha, if it's said by a Jew. If we hear the whole Bracha from a goy we also answer, otherwise we don't (we're afraid he said things we don't agree with) [SA & Rma OC 215:2]

So, apparently, a goy can say a Bracha, and we even say Amen. (Rma says ועונין אמן, I'm not sure if this should be understood as an obligation or not. I tend to understand that it is and obligation)

share|improve this answer
As I recall, this is referring to birkos hanehenin, and a non-Jew should say "Elohei Yisrael" rather than the standard nusach of "Eloheinu". Further the rationale of "asur l'hanos... b'li b'racha" provided by the gemara appears to suggest that all humans must thank God prior to eating (for example). However, non-Jews might not be bound by the מטבע שטבעו חזל beyond certain standard aspects of the formatting of blessings (e.g. shem u'malchus). As far as a blessing being absolutely required, I question whether it would be considered actual theft to benefit without a blessing.... – Fred Oct 11 '12 at 1:03
...Though I see no reason why the specific birkos ha'r'eeyah for natural wonders would be forbidden, either. If anything, it seems to me like a praiseworthy practice. (Then again, I haven't researched it, which is why I'm not posting my own answer). – Fred Oct 11 '12 at 1:07
@Fred, I can't see where you're going with this. – JNF Oct 11 '12 at 21:51
My main comment was that a non-Jew should not use exactly the same wording (see my first sentence in comment #1). Beyond that, I was basically rambling. – Fred Oct 14 '12 at 19:45
@Fred, I see. That's why we need to hear him out, so that he doesn't say a different name by "mistake". – JNF Oct 14 '12 at 21:39

brochos with name of God - even Jews are not allowed beyond what was instituted.

as for thanking God without getting into saying God's name - absolutely. just like any one who benefits from someone else. my $0.02

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.