Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In פרק קנין תורה (read as though it were the sixth chapter of Avos during the annual, repeated reading of Avos), we have:

הלא דברים קל וחומר ומה דוד מלך ישראל שלא למד מאחיתופל אלא שני דברים בלבד קראו רבו אלופו ומידעו הלומד מחברו פרק אחד או הלכה אחת או פסוק אחד או דבור אחד או אפילו אות אחת על אחת כמה וכמה שצריך לנהג בו כבוד

David, king of Israel, who learned from Achisofel nothing more than merely two things, and called [Achisofel] his master…, so one who learns from his fellow a single chapter, a single law, a single verse, a single statement, or even a single letter, all the more so must he act toward him with respect.

Why don't we say dayo laba min hadin lihyos kanidon (from Bava Kama 2:5) and demand honor only from a student of two things, not from a student of one?

share|improve this question
Seems that the triple praise of Achitofel was superlative. I'd speculate that this implies that teaching less than two items would entitle someone to at least one honorific. – Fred Sep 19 '12 at 7:26
Is there some fancy Latin way of saying dayo? – Double AA Sep 20 '12 at 1:38
Well, if there is one, I imagine msh210 would know it. – Double AA Sep 20 '12 at 16:23
up vote 7 down vote accepted

The Baal Shem Tov asked this question (Keser Shem Tov Siman 22, quoted by the Lubavitcher Rebbe here) and answered as follows: The Gemora in Chagiga (3b) says that words of Torah are compared to a plant, for just as a plant grows and increases, so the words of Torah grow and increase. This means that when one teaches a Torah idea to another, he is not merely communicating information, but is presenting him with an idea that continues to grow and multiply. However, the Baal Shem Tov writes that this is only the case if the teacher is an upright individual. If he is a rosha, all he convey is the bare information, devoid of the growing life of Torah. This explains the Kal Vechomer: If Achisofel - a rosha who only gave Dovid Hamelech two pieces of information and nothing more - was called "My Master", how much more so "chaveyro", one's counterpart in Torah who can impart words of Torah that grow and multiply deserves honour.

share|improve this answer
+1, very nice (not that the Besht needs my haskama), thanks. – msh210 Sep 19 '12 at 16:04

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.