Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In the First Posuk it says:

וירא בלק בן ציפור (And Balak the son of Tzippor Saw)

no mention of his Royal status ,later on in the Parsha it says:

"ובלק בן ציפור מלך למואב (Balak the son of Tzippor was a King of Maov)

What happened that only later the torah tells us that he was king?

share|improve this question
    
Here's a shiur from Rabbi Paltiel that brings many commentaries that discuss this: insidechassidus.org/summer/276-parshas-balak/… –  Menachem Jun 29 '12 at 7:22
add comment

2 Answers 2

up vote 4 down vote accepted

The Ohr Hachayim asks: a) Why does it say Balak saw what Israel did... The entire Moav was scared, it should say Moav saw. b) Midyan had plenty to be scared of, too, but the pasuk doesn't mention it.

He answers that Balak was really part of the chiefs of Midyan. When the Torah says Balak saw, its like saying Midyan was worried about the situation. When Moav grew fearful, they then recruited Balak to be their king. (see seforno that he was skilled at war, but the O"H doesn't say why)

share|improve this answer
    
So first he was a chief and then afterwards he became king its a more exact of above,(he probably used the "problem of the Jews" as a campaign platform as the Brisker Rov Indicate Thanks for the details I will up you for it –  SimchasTorah Jun 23 '10 at 13:48
add comment

The Brisker Rov answers at first he was not King, it was only after he said theses Jews bring all the suffering in the world then and only then did they make him a King. Like the Gemara says in Gittin (56b): "המיצר לישראל נעשה ראש"

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.