Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have heard many times in the name of Rabbi Shimshon Rafael Hirsch that every Hebrew shoresh (usually defined with three letters) has a more basic root of two letters. I also heard in his name that letters which are phonetically similar are also interchangeable in shorashim.

Is it true that he said this? If so, where did he say this? Are there any rules for the application of this?

(The concept of two-letter shorashim is not completely foreign to traditional Judaism; for example, the HaKsav VeHaKabalah uses it.)

share|improve this question
    
(L'havdil, Jastrow was a proponent of the two-letter-root theory.) For "that letters which are phonetically similar are also interchangeable in shorashim", see RSRH's commentary throughout Chumash: he does this over and over and over again. – msh210 Aug 17 '12 at 5:22
3  
I'm no expert in Hirsch, but I'm pretty sure that he uses three-letter roots for Hebrew words. He does however use the idea that each individual letter has an independent general concept associated with it which sheds light on the meaning of the roots with that letter. Also, phonetically similar letters are not interchangeable in the sense that switching one for another results in the same meaning, but rather that words with such "interchangeable" letters have related/similar/comparable meanings. See the introduction to this book for further elaboration. – jake Aug 17 '12 at 6:04
2  
ba, msh210's right R' Hirsch analyzes phonetically-related roots as related (as @jake very aptly rephrases your "interchangeable") very frequently. You needn't dig too far into Sefer Bereishit to find the first example. See his commentary on "Bara" in 1:1 (p. 3 in the earlier English translation), where he compares the root BRA to the roots BRCh, BRH, PRCh, PRA, and PRNg, "which all have the meaning of striving to get out, or getting out a a state of being constrained or bound." – Isaac Moses Aug 21 '12 at 3:59
    
The Artscroll Rashi often discusses in the notes an ancient debate about two-letter roots and three-letter roots. (That is, are all words comprised of three-letter roots, or may some roots contain only two letters?) Not sure if the discussion is applicable or not. – Doniel Filreis Jun 15 at 4:46
    
The Malbim also discusses this kind of thing in Vayikra on the word כרמל (in the parsha about the omer). He discusses the relationship between the two ways of looking at it, where the more basic 1- and 2-letter shorashim are built up into 3- or 4- or occasionally 5-letter ones. – Heshy Jun 15 at 12:16

A detailed explanation of the two root theory can be in Edward Horowitz, How the Hebrew Language Grew, chapter 14 "How Two Letters Become Three." The book has been republished several times and is available on Amazon.

share|improve this answer
    
Hello, welcome to Mi Yodeya, and thanks for your first answer! If you haven’t done so already, you should take a look at the tour. Please consider registering your account, to enable more site features, including voting. I hope you find more Q&A of interest and stay learning with us! – mbloch Jun 15 at 4:34
    
This being said, it would be really helpful if you could summarize his theory. Otherwise the answer is of little value to most of us. Many thanks – mbloch Jun 15 at 4:34

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.