Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I was reading this excellent post about tzedakah and it seems that after a person is mafrish (designates monies as) tzedakah and the recipient disappears, he can give it to someone else. That made me think of the following question.

Can you donate Tzedakah with no-one in mind? Does there have to be a poor needy intended recipient at the time of the donation for it to be considered Tzedakah, or is there a theoretical pool of Tzedakah money where I can donate money to and then later decide who will get it?

share|improve this question
3  
wouldn't that be a rabbi's discretionary fund? You donate, he decides. 2 of the rambam's 8 levels of charity include where the giver does not know who receives the money so he couldn't have anyone in mind. –  Danno Aug 16 '12 at 14:43
1  
@Dan Sounds like an answer to me. –  Double AA Aug 16 '12 at 14:56
1  
more of a request for clarification -- I suspect that there is something more intended by the question. Based on an earlier question by Yehuda, it seems that his concern is about mentally dedicating money to the idea of charity without apportioning it physically to anyone. If I have a $5 in my wallet and think "I should give that away" does it have the status of tzeddakah even before I am aware of any place/person to give it to. Or maybe he is asking the more basic question. i don't know. –  Danno Aug 16 '12 at 15:01
    
@Dan I am asking the more basic question, but in the case of the Rambam he knows he is giving it to an Ani, just not whom. Therefore he gives it straight into the reshus of an Ani. Here however, it is just going into his Tzedaka pile and at the moment is in the Reshus of whom? –  yehuda Aug 16 '12 at 16:54
add comment

1 Answer 1

Regarding Matanot Le'evyonim, gifts to the poor on Purim, Rabbi Yisroel Dov Webster (Dayan, Yeshiva Emek Halacha) writes as follows:

If there are no poor people in one’s community, the gifts which he usually gives should be set aside until he has an opportunity to give them to the poor.

share|improve this answer
    
the same thing is said in more primary sources, but I didn't look them up right now. –  Menachem Aug 16 '12 at 22:32
    
looks good to me so far –  yehuda Aug 16 '12 at 23:32
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.