Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In response to another question, I was told that the Talmud was considered canonical by Orthodox Jews. I have heard it called authoritative, but never canonical before. The cursory sources I checked did not include the Talmud as a part of the canon, though they clearly recognized it as authoritative as well.

So, is the Talmud part of the canon?

share|improve this question
    
See this: judaism.stackexchange.com/a/17782/1569 –  b a Aug 9 '12 at 22:04
3  
This is not an answerable question. Whether something is canonical depends on your definition of canonical. Wiktionary has six adjective definitions (besides those from the fields of music and math); W3NID online and OED online each have four. (Likewise, canon has varying definitions.) Closing. –  msh210 Aug 9 '12 at 22:32
2  
@msh210 I strongly disagree. If someone cannot answer this question, that is very sad. It's answerable because Judaism (and the Talmud itself) has a clear definition of what canonical means. The Talmud is most definitely not part of our scriptural canon. It is, however, (colloquially) canonical in the sense that we are not empowered to overrule it, and it, itself, has defined parameters as to what is considered talmudical. –  Seth J Aug 9 '12 at 23:36
    
@SethJ Is Gemara not Scriptural? –  Double AA Aug 9 '12 at 23:42
    
I see I must concede @msh210's point. However, I still object to this on the grounds that it's a distinction in English usage, not a distinction in the Gemara. –  Seth J Aug 10 '12 at 0:12
add comment

closed as not constructive by msh210 Aug 9 '12 at 22:32

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

2 Answers

up vote 3 down vote accepted

I meant canonical as in authoritative/indisputable as a matter of law; not that it is part of the Biblical canon. That is why I wrote "places canonical value" and not something like "considers part of the canon." See this blog post for further elaboration.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for the clarification. –  AdamRedwine Aug 9 '12 at 22:35
    
@AdamRedwine No problem. –  Dov F Aug 9 '12 at 22:36
add comment

See definition 2 of canon:

2. A group of literary works that are generally accepted as representing a field.

"the durable canon of American short fiction" — William Styron

Or 3c from here:

[Middle English, from Late Latin, from Latin, standard]

3b. a sanctioned or accepted group or body of related works <the canon of great literature>

share|improve this answer
    
This doesn't explain whether the Talmud is in either category. –  Yirmeyahu Aug 9 '12 at 22:20
    
@Yirmeyahu I doubt there's anyone who disputers that the Talmud meets both criteria for Jewish thought. –  Charles Koppelman Aug 10 '12 at 15:18
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.