Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

At the beginning of the 4th chapter of Pirkei D'Rebbi Eliezer, it states [my own translation]:

On the second day God created the heavens (rakiyah), the angels and the fire of flesh and blood (aisho shel basar v'dam), and the fire of hell.

What does fire of flesh and blood actually mean, especially if no living thing on earth was yet created?

share|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

R' David Luria says that it means physical fire. However, he points out two conflicting Midrashim. One says that physical fire was created on the first day of creation, and the other says it was created on Motzei Shabbat.

He therefore questions this statement of the Pirkei D'Rebbi Eliezer. Were it not for the Ramban authenticating this version of the Midrash (by quoting it elsewhere), he would have said it was a misprint.

However, because the Ramban corroborates this version, R' David Luria suggests that physical fire was created on the second day, but remained in the heavens until Motzei Shabbat, when it descended to earth.

share|improve this answer
I'd assume that what happened just after Day Seven was that humans made fire by striking together two rocks. That's the first "artificial fire" (or as you will, when G-d's creation finished, technology began). But naturally-occurring fire may very well have existed earlier. The midrash is fascinating because you can't have fire without oxygen, so it makes sense that it showed up on Day 2 if the "firmament of the skies" includes an oxygen-rich atmosphere! – Shalom Aug 7 '12 at 17:46
@Shalom: R' David Luria's explanation is consistent with the P.D.E. See chapter 20, where the P.D.E. says that G-d sent Adam a pillar of fire; hebrewbooks.org/… – Menachem Aug 7 '12 at 22:22
That's a fascinating difference from the Babylonian Talmud's version: "G-d put this idea in Adam's head to strike two rocks together." Of course, Rabbi Eliezer's rabbinic career got a start by a very clear message sent to him by G-d (ch. 1), so it's not surprising he'd understand the revelation of fire to have happened in a similar fashion. – Shalom Aug 8 '12 at 8:56

I would assume it means "the same normal fire as known as fire by flesh-and-blood humans today."

share|improve this answer
I have no idea what that means, can you please elaborate? – not-allowed to change my name Aug 7 '12 at 1:08
@vram perhaps le'afukei the fire of gehenom – Shmuel Brin Aug 7 '12 at 1:26
This is what the Radal writes hebrewbooks.org/… – b a Aug 7 '12 at 1:29

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.