Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm learning now Horayos, and it seems to me that Rashi there is somewhat different. Too verbose, I would say. Are there any sources that in Horayos Rashi is indeed Rashi, or it is not?

share|improve this question
    
It is not really written by Rashi. See here. –  jake Jul 30 '12 at 14:58
2  
@jake Looks like an answer. –  Double AA Jul 30 '12 at 16:29
    
@jake Good catch. It really was too much verbose :) –  Double AA Jul 30 '12 at 17:06
    
@DoubleAA indeed :) –  jutky Jul 30 '12 at 18:54
add comment

1 Answer

When I learned a few of the Dapim in Horayos almost a couple years ago, my Chavrusa told me that according to some opinions, the commentary attributed to Rashi was not written by him. Therefore, it is not called Rashi, and is instead called Mefareish.

Cf: Rashi in Horayos

share|improve this answer
    
(FWIW, this former chavrusa of mine now gives an Amud Yomi shiur on Masecheta Shabbos that you can access at www.livestream.com/levshas at 9:30pm CST.) –  Adam Mosheh Jul 30 '12 at 15:01
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.