Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The Taz YD 116:6 on the last line brings a case that he heard that one should protest putting a needle into bread. What is the Taz referring, to and what exactly is he worried about?

share|improve this question
related? today.msnbc.msn.com/id/48209579/ns/travel-news -- MSNBC 7/17/2012 - "Authorities investigate needles in airplane sandwiches" – Menachem Jul 26 '12 at 0:37
up vote 5 down vote accepted

It seems that the Taz is saying that one should object to feeding a vicious dog a loaf of bread with a needle in it, as a way of disposing of it. Rather, the proper way to kill the dog is with poison. It seems that, according to the Taz, giving the dog a loaf of bread with a needle in it is not, in this instance, a violation of tzaar baalei chaim nor of bal tashchis. However, it is a concern that this will drive the vicious dog mad, and it can be a life-threatening danger to others.

Also, it seems that even some people nowadays think to do this. Consider this case, from Feb 2012:

A Michigan man who hid needles in meat that was eaten by a neighbor’s dog faces sentencing after pleading no contest to attempted animal killing or torture.

share|improve this answer
seems like that's the pshat,thanks.It is it more advice or halahcha? – sam Jul 12 '12 at 3:27
Josh, what I am having trouble understanding is, is this independent (and tangentially related, I suppose), or is this a Limud that he is applying to the case at hand? If it's the former, so what? And if it's the latter, huh? – Seth J Jul 12 '12 at 3:35
@SethJ I assumed the same,but I guess not. – sam Jul 12 '12 at 3:45
sorry, i'm not sure i understand the question. it seems like it is halacha, and dealing, i suppose, with a somewhat prevalent means of killing vicious animals in the 17th century. (One doesn't advise protest against a random practice that nobody would ever do.) And since the topic turned to killing animals via poison, he turned to cover this case as well. See also my emendation to the answer. – josh waxman Jul 12 '12 at 4:20

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.