Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is it considered to be "un-tznius" (immodest) for ladies to tear keriyah (rip their clothes in mourning) in public?

share|improve this question
related: judaism.stackexchange.com/q/2219/1059 – Adam Mosheh Jun 19 '12 at 4:04
That's not a reason to do a full rollback whereby you also lose the explanation and appropriate tags. Just edit the word tear back in if you want. – Double AA Jun 19 '12 at 14:56
Who voted to close as off topic? – Double AA Jun 20 '12 at 21:31
up vote 11 down vote accepted

The Shulchan Aruch rules (YD 340:11) that women and men have an equal obligation in terms of keri'a, but that women should turn their undershirt around after tearing it before tearing her overshirt. Furthermore, in :15 he rules that a woman who performed keri'a is allowed to perform a non-professional stitch-up immediately after tearing, whereas a man would have to wait 30 days to do so when tearing for his parents.

share|improve this answer
Why shouldn't men do the same? Modesty is for both genders. – Adam Mosheh Jun 19 '12 at 14:56
@AdamMosheh Modesty is for both genders and each gender has a different way of being modest. – Double AA Jun 19 '12 at 14:57
@AA - But why should men be less modest than women? – Adam Mosheh Jun 19 '12 at 15:03
@AdamMosheh Not less. Different. – Double AA Jun 19 '12 at 15:04
@AdamMosheh Because women have breasts, and men don't. So a tear in the top would be immodest for women only. – user2392 Feb 13 '13 at 11:29

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.