Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Samuel dies less than halfway through the books of Samuel. Why name the books after him?

share|improve this question
1  
Please split this into two questions. –  Isaac Moses Jun 12 '12 at 16:11
    
probably cuz he wrote it –  Baal Shemot Tovot Jun 12 '12 at 16:14
2  
@هه ... so he wrote it before he died in 1Sam 25:1? The rest came from navua? Moses only recounts 7 psukim after his death and there was no prophet greater than him. –  Charles Koppelman Jun 12 '12 at 16:28
1  
@CharlesKoppelman, what do you mean by "can't ask"? Is the site telling you it's too short? Add some motivation. –  Isaac Moses Jun 12 '12 at 16:35
1  
@CharlesKoppelman Moshe was the greatest prophet in terms of how God communicated to him. See Bamidbar 12. Its qualitative not quantitative –  Baal Shemot Tovot Jun 12 '12 at 16:41
show 3 more comments

1 Answer

up vote 7 down vote accepted

This is discussed, of course, by Abarbanel, first thing in Sefer Shmuel.

An initial glance at the names of the books of Tanach shows us that the books are not necessarily named for their authors, especially in this case being that Shmuel clearly did not author a large portion of Sefer Shmuel. Rather, books are named for their content.

There are two ways to look at the overarching theme of Sefer Shmuel that would explain the choice of name for this book:

  1. The life and accomplishments of Shmuel Hanavi. Clearly, the book begins this way, starting with the story of Shmuel's birth and his education and his prophet-hood etc. The rest of the book, which deals with the events relating to Shaul and David, can also be attributed to Shmuel, since Shaul and David are "his doing", in that he found them and anointed them as kings. In this respect, the entire sefer is about Shmuel, and thus rightly named.
  2. The transition from the period of judges (shoftim) to the period of kings (melachim). Shmuel was the last of the judges and David was the first of the kings (discounting Shaul). Arguably, each of these personalities was the greatest of their respective categories, and so this can also be looked at as the high point of both periods. We would then describe this sefer as the story of lives of Shmuel and David, which marked a turning point in Jewish leadership. Of course, this necessitates the stories of Eli and Shaul to be included as well, given their importance to the Shmuel and David narratives. Now, we cannot call the book by two names (Shmuel and David), and so we choose Shmuel because he was the greater of the two with respect to his level of prophecy and with respect to his parentage, and because he was David's teacher and deserving of his respect.
share|improve this answer
    
Bear in mind that (IIRC) the Abarbanel disagrees with the gemara Bava Batra when it comes to who authored the books of tanach. I think this was discussed elsewhere on this site. –  Baal Shemot Tovot Jun 12 '12 at 16:45
1  
@هه, That is true. However, with respect to Sefer Shmuel, he agrees that Shmuel Hanavi, Nathan Hanavi, and Gad Hachozeh each wrote parts of it, as stated by Chazal in Bava Basra. (He also adds that likely Yirmiyahu compiled it into its final form, to account for several "עד היום הזה" and similar statements.) This is also evident from I Divrei Hayamim 29:29. –  jake Jun 12 '12 at 16:53
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.