Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

As a kid, I was told that if you wear clothing backwards or inside-out then you will forget your Torah learning. What is the source for that claim, and why is that specific outcome tied to that practice?

share|improve this question
2  
Seeing the title of this question made me jump. –  msh210 Jun 7 '12 at 4:55
1  
@msh210 why is that? –  user1552 Jun 7 '12 at 13:25
    
I've heard sleeping in your socks makes you forget Torah; I haven't heard this about wearing clothes backwards or inside out. –  Seth J Jun 7 '12 at 14:32
add comment

3 Answers 3

up vote 3 down vote accepted

There are two statements about clothes that are normally brought together, and are therfore often confused (see here as an example).

  1. Shulchan Aruch Orach Chaim 2:3 - One should be careful to put on his shirt the right way, and not wear it backwards. The Magen Avraham (S"K 3) explains that (based on Rashi Shabbat 114A) if the disgusting stitches are facing outwards people will see them and he will become disgusting in the eyes of others.

  2. The Magen Avraham then quotes Shaar HaKavanot of the Arizal that one should not put on two items of clothes at the same time, as it can make one forget.

    {for reference, the Shulchan Aruch HaRav and Mishna Berura on this Halacha}

The Shaar HaKavanot doesn't mention anything about wearing clothes backwards with connection to forgetting. He gives a reason why putting on two garments simultaneously can cause one to forget.

The reason connects physical garments to the spiritual garments of a person, and explains how a person's garments are naturally holy, but by doing sins causes the holy garments to be under the control of the Klipot (forces of impurity). garments surround a person and each garment has a surrounding light (Ohr Makif) that is so high that it cannot be touched by the forces of impurity, thereby shielding the garment itself from the forces of impurity.

When one puts on two garments at once, he leaves no room for the surrounding light between the first and second garment. The garment is therefore vulnerable to Klipot, and Klipot cause forgetfulness, as we know that there is no forgetfulness in the forces of purity and holiness.

Interestingly, it appears from this that there is no problem with putting on two non-overlapping garments (such as both socks or shoes) at once.

The Shulchan Aruch Ha-Ari (S"K 6) explains the same thing in a more simple way.

share|improve this answer
    
Our answers both come to the same basic conclusion. Question is, can anyone verify whether the Yalkut Yosef quoted by ba is saying what ba thinks he is? –  Double AA Jun 7 '12 at 6:09
1  
Menachem, in #2, does M"A mention what will be forgotten (ie., Torah)? Could it just be generally good practice to avoid forgetting what items you're wearing and suffering unpleasant consequences as a result? Maybe a modern example could be a person keeping his Yarmulke in his baseball cap, throwing the cap on his head on the way out of the house, assuming the Yarmulke is there, and then later take off his cap and discover that, today of all days, the one time he needed to remove his cap, he didn't have a Yarmulke on? If only he'd made a habit of putting all his clothes on individually! –  Seth J Jun 7 '12 at 14:31
    
@SethJ: The Talmud (Horiot 13A - hebrewbooks.org/…) talks about things that cause one to forget learning. While it doesn't use the term Kashe LeShikcha there (nor does it talk about putting on two garments simultaneously), other places that reference that Gemara do use the term Kashe Leshikcha, such as the Ohr HaTorah from the Maggid of Mezritch - chabadlibrary.org/books/default.aspx?furl=/magid/ot/39/… –  Menachem Jun 7 '12 at 20:40
    
@SethJ: Also see here (Maggid Devarav LeYaakov #217) where the Maggid of Mezritch talks about the forgetfulness caused by eating olives (Horiot 13A) and says that the forgetfulness in forgetting G-d, which causes one to sin. - hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=19784&pgnum=120 –  Menachem Jun 7 '12 at 20:51
    
@DoubleAA: There is this, but I'm not 100% sure what this site is: yalkut.info/… –  Menachem Jun 7 '12 at 21:03
add comment

The Talmud (Shabbat 114a) defines a Talmid Chacham as someone who is careful to wear his clothing right-side-in. The Shulchan Aruch rules this way in Choshen Mishpat 162:21 and explains the reason to be that a Talmid Chacham must be careful to look respectful and inside-out clothing shows its stiching and looks disgraceful. The Shulchan Aruch also recommends in Orach Chaim 2:3 that everyone be careful about this, lest people begin to think negatively about each other. The Taz (OC 2 sk 2) and Shulchan Aruch HaRav (OC 2:2) rule that if he already put it on inside-out he does not need to fix it, unless he is a Talmid Chacham where he is in danger of causing people to dislike the Torah. However, none of these sources mention forgetfulness.

share|improve this answer
    
Seems like a comment. –  msh210 Jun 7 '12 at 6:01
    
@msh210 I'd say it's a rejection of his thesis. –  Double AA Jun 7 '12 at 6:06
    
@msh210, I think this works. It addresses the underlying issue, and it provides a (few) source(s) for it, and it demonstrates that the pre-supposed reason in the question is not the reason given in the original source(s). –  Seth J Jun 7 '12 at 14:25
    
@SethJ, DoubleAA, fair enough. –  msh210 Jun 7 '12 at 14:39
add comment

Yalkut Yosef 2:3. (Interestingly, the Mishnah Brurah 2:2 doesn't list it in his list of things that make you forget. But as a side point, even the M"B holds that it's forbidden to do it, but I can't remember where he said it.)

The reason: R' Dr. Asher Meir writes in Meaning in Mitzvot p. 10 that this is because it is a shortcut (being too lazy to take it off and putting it back on right). Everything you do as a shortcut (i.e. out of laziness) leads to forgetfulness.

share|improve this answer
2  
YY first came out in 1971. If that was, as the asker sought, "the source" for what he/she heard as a child, then I guess we know how old he/she is at a maximum. –  msh210 Jun 7 '12 at 4:58
1  
Oh, and re "even the M"B holds that it's forbidden to do it, but I can't remember where he said it", have you been wearing your clothes the wrong way? –  msh210 Jun 7 '12 at 5:06
1  
@msh210 I don't think Yalkut Yosef was the original source, but it's where I saw it (because I also happened to be looking for a source and I found yalkut.info). –  b a Jun 7 '12 at 12:41
    
@msh210: I've never read the Yalkut Yosef, is that yalkut.info the full text? It appears that after every Halacha he brings a source from what appears to be the Yalkut Yosef, so is this not the full text? - It is mentioned here: yalkut.info/… –  Menachem Jun 7 '12 at 21:04
    
@Menachem I don't exactly know what it is; I refer to it as Kitzur Shu"A Yalkut Yosef in my notes in halachah. I found out about it here. (The link in the main post was, unfortunately, hacked; however, yalkut.info was provided in the comments.) –  b a Jun 8 '12 at 0:11
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.