Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Rashi says

What does the subject of Shemittah have with Mount Sinai? Were not all the commandments stated from Sinai? However, [this teaches us that] just as with Shemittah, its general principles and its finer details were all stated from Sinai, likewise, all of them were stated-their general principles [together with] their finer details-from Sinai.

Yet, in all other mitzvos (Shabbos, for example), one who violates a Tolda of an Aveira has still Biblically violated that Aveira. However, one who violates a Tolda of Shmitta did not.

What does Rashi mean?

share|improve this question
    
Are you sure the Rambam means derabanan and not just that there is no onesh? – Double AA May 17 '12 at 19:49
    
@DoubleAA I thought Makas Mardus means it's only punishable derabanan – Shmuel Brin May 17 '12 at 20:16
    
Only punishable derabanan, but maybe still assur deorayta. And maybe not. We would have to check somehow. – Double AA May 17 '12 at 20:17
    
That's all part of the "general principles [together with] their finer details". At Sinai all the details of the laws of Shemita were told, including the fact that only specific Tuldot are punishable. – Menachem May 17 '12 at 20:52
    
Shmuel Brin, I'm not following how your question is related to Rashi. – YDK May 17 '12 at 21:15

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.