Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Rashi says

What does the subject of Shemittah have with Mount Sinai? Were not all the commandments stated from Sinai? However, [this teaches us that] just as with Shemittah, its general principles and its finer details were all stated from Sinai, likewise, all of them were stated-their general principles [together with] their finer details-from Sinai.

Yet, in all other mitzvos (Shabbos, for example), one who violates a Tolda of an Aveira has still Biblically violated that Aveira. However, one who violates a Tolda of Shmitta did not.

What does Rashi mean?

share|improve this question
    
Are you sure the Rambam means derabanan and not just that there is no onesh? –  Double AA May 17 '12 at 19:49
    
@DoubleAA I thought Makas Mardus means it's only punishable derabanan –  Shmuel Brin May 17 '12 at 20:16
    
Only punishable derabanan, but maybe still assur deorayta. And maybe not. We would have to check somehow. –  Double AA May 17 '12 at 20:17
    
That's all part of the "general principles [together with] their finer details". At Sinai all the details of the laws of Shemita were told, including the fact that only specific Tuldot are punishable. –  Menachem May 17 '12 at 20:52
    
Shmuel Brin, I'm not following how your question is related to Rashi. –  YDK May 17 '12 at 21:15
show 3 more comments

Know someone who can answer? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook.

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.