Why are Benei Noach obligated in their Seven Mitzvot if they never said Na'aseh veNishma?
|
|
Because it is a much more basic covenant than that which exists between G-d and Bnei Yisrael. The latter is based on mutual responsibility and chosenness. G-d chose Bnei Yisrael for a particular mission. He also chose them as His protected people because of the actions of their fathers. If Bnei Yisrael abide by G-d's commandments, which are set up in such a way as to mark them as a priestly and princely nation, with heavy responsibilities as well as certain privileges, then G-d will protect them in their land and provide them with their needs. But they have to be worthy of this role. Contrast that with the covenant between G-d and Noaḥ. G-d promised not to destroy the world. Bnei Noaḥ just have to be decent people (from the Biblical perspective, the 7 Noahide Laws are a moral code, not a legal one like the Torah - this includes recognizing and not cursing G-d, btw). All Bnei Noaḥ must be worthy of, then, is not to be destroyed. And since it was a unilateral covenant, even if they become depraved again, G-d promised not to destroy the entire world as a result. Sedom and 'Amorah demonstrate, however, that micro-level destructions for depravity are still fair game. |
|||
|
|
|
Because it wasn't put to them as a choice, but unilaterally imposed on Noach and his descendants by G-d. Being human carries basic obligations, because humans have abilities animals do not and a corresponding charge that animals do not: basic maintenance of the world (the Jewish understanding of the word often mistranslated to English as "subdue"). |
|||||||||
|
|
It seems from the gemara (Hullin 92a bottom line) that they did indeed accept commandments upon themselves. The gemara uses the phrase:
|
||||
|
|
|
Bnei Noach according to the Torah and discrete mathematical logic are all the descendants of Noach, unless they progress beyond the covenant of Noach. They then become Jews or geirim. The proof of this is the next covenant given to Avraham at which time he and his family become the defining line of Torah observance and reception. The next covenant is that of Har Sinai which promises life. Therefore the question is not relevant because it is the covenant of Har Sinai that defines those that keep מצות. Short of the full Torah everyone is in the same boat, if you will, because they reject or do not take on the full Torah. Even born Jews rejecting even one מצוה drop out of the covenant of Har Sinai, so to make a distinction between how many מצות to keep is a false premise. See Devarim 27:26. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|