Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is it muttar to set aside the rules of shabbos to save a fetus? If so, how is it possible to reconcile that with the permissibility of killing a fetus (abortion)?

share|improve this question
    
This page (rationalistmedicalhalacha.blogspot.com/2010/12/…) suggests that there may be some discussion of this topic in Rashi's mishna in Niddah 44a. –  SAH Apr 4 '12 at 4:27
9  
The second part of your question would be stronger if you'd refer to some source[s] that indicate whether and when killing a fetus is, in fact, permissible. –  Isaac Moses Apr 4 '12 at 4:33

2 Answers 2

up vote 9 down vote accepted

The Gemara says that if a pregnant woman is desperately craving food, she can eat it even on Yom Kippur if needed. The Rishonim there discuss that this is firstly out of concern for her own safety; furthermore, if not having this food may harm the fetus, it's a lot riskier to the mother to deliver a stillborn than it is a live baby. But beyond that, the Rishonim imply that saving the "proto-life" of the fetus is still enough to violate Yom Kippur (and hence shabbos). Certainly if the fetus is at 40 or more days post-conception, and possibly even earlier.

Even if we view the fetus as not "fully alive yet", we have the concept of "violate one shabbos to save a life, so that more shabboses will be kept"; thus, we have a potential life here, which is enough to warrant breaking shabbos or yom kippur.

share|improve this answer
    
Where do you learn that there's any implication that this is to save the woman's fetus? Every time I've read this, it's been entirely woman-focused. –  Charles Koppelman Oct 31 '12 at 19:03
    
It's discussed in the Rishonim there. "Putting aside the question of the mother, would the fetus alone be enough..." –  Shalom Oct 31 '12 at 19:18

Rabbi EY Waldenburg (Tzitz Eliezer) discusses this question; his ruling is brought down by Rabbi Dr. Abraham Steinberg in Hilchos Rofi'm uRefuah (Mossad Harav Kook, 1978), 2:1:17:

כאשר יסוד ההיתר לחילול שבת הוא משום הסברא של "חלל עליו שבת אחת כדי שישמור שבתות הרבה" -- כגון בעובר, יש מקום לומר שאז מותר חילול שבת רק במקרים של ודאי פקוח נפש ולא בספק פקוח נפש.‏

When the basis for the allowance of desecrating Shabbos is because of "Desecrate one Shabbos, so that he can keep many Shabbosos" (usually it's because of וחי בהם, but there are exceptions -- Shokhet) -- for example, with a fetus; there is room to say that one is only allowed to desecrate Shabbos for cases of certain danger to life, and not in cases of uncertain danger to life.

He cites Tzitz Eliezer 8:15:7:1-9 and 9:17:2:22 as the sources for this ruling, as well as many more in the footnote to that halacha.

share|improve this answer
    
I'm not sure what "כאשר יסוד ההיתר לחילול שבת הוא משום הסברא של "חלל עליו שבת אחת כדי שישמור שבתות הרבה"" means, given Yoma 85a-b; if anyone can explain it without making me read a lot of ציץ אליאזר, that would be greatly appreciated :) –  Shokhet Nov 30 at 20:55

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.