The medrosh criticizes Eisov for trapping his father with questions such as "must one tithe salt," yet doesn't specify that it was shobbos, so there should be no melucha of "tzud"! Is this proof that the Avos kept shobbos all week long?
- Anybody can ask a question
- Anybody can answer
- The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
closed as too localized by Isaac Moses Mar 12 '12 at 5:12
This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
It can't be, because the verse (Genesis 22:3) states:
but we know the Rama rules (Shulchan Aruch OC 281:1) that we start davening late on Shabbat morning. Therefore, we can conclude that it was not Shabbat for Avraham on that day.
Furthermore, Genesis 27:25 relates about Yitzchak:
but we know the Shulchan Aruch rules (OC 271:4) that you can only eat after saying kiddush on Shabbat. Therefore, we can conclude that it was not Shabbat for Yitzchak on that day.
Furthermore, in Genesis 28:22 Yaakov says:
but we know the Shulchan Aruch rules (OC 307:1) that you can't speak on Shabbat about doing forbidden labor even after Shabbat. Therefore, we can conclude that it was not Shabbat for Yaakov on that day.
The Avos did not keep shabbos all week. The midrash was critical that Esav was tzayid b'fiv- he trapped with his mouth. The trapping was done kilachar yad, in an unusual way. This was a violation of שֵׁשֶׁת יָמִים תַּעֲבֹד וְעָשִׂיתָ כָּל-מְלַאכְתֶּךָ.
Yes, the avos kept shabas all week long, but the imahos did not. Consider:
While you can ask how Avraham cut animals in half (15:10), this was presumably on a direct command (not stated in the pasuk) from Hashem, which of course overrides a general mitzva.
And his "repaying his credit" (Rashi to 13:3) was done not with money but with services, which can be done on shabas: he was a magid, an itinerant preacher, who of course can work on shabas.
You may ask about Yitzchak's digging wells in 26:18, 22. But we see in verses 19 and 21 that his servants did the digging. The two interior p'sukim specifying it was his servants surrounded by the two saying "Yitzchak" serve as a k'lal ufrat uchlal, i ata dan ela k'en hap'rat, so we see that all the wells were dug by people affiliated with Yitzchak. None, however, were actually dug by him: what do you take him for, a m'chalal shabas, chas v'shalom?