In the Hagada of Peasach it says "even if he brought us to Har Sinai but didn't give us the Torah it would have been enough." What would be the purpose of going to Har Sinai if we didn't get the Torah? How would that be enough?
|
|
One popular explanation: When the Jewish People reached Mount Sinai, the Torah (Ex. 19:2) describes their encampment in the singular form - ויחן שם ישראל נגד ההר. Rashi, citing Mechilta, states that this means that they really felt unified, "as one person, with one heart." That unity among Jews, then, was by itself worth reaching Sinai in order to achieve. (Alshich to this verse. He associates their ability to achieve such unity with the idea that their zuhama (spiritual filth) disappeared at that point, as noted in Avrohom Yitzchok's answer.) |
|||||
|
|
Aside from the other excellent answers listed here, two points: 1) Dayeinu does not mean that it would have been enough for us, as in it being an end in itself, but rather than it would have been sufficient cause for us to give praise to Hashem. See here for further elaboration. Each step in the process was wonderful and deserving of our praise. 2) This was a fulfillment of a Divine promise in Shemot 3:11-12:
|
|||||||||
|
|
I'd have to find the source, but one of the answers I remember learning is based on the Talmud (Makkot 23B-24A). There (also brought in this answer), the Talmud tells us that the verse (Devarim 33:4) "תּוֹרָה צִוָּה לָנוּ מֹשֶׁה מוֹרָשָׁה קְהִלַּת יַעֲקֹב", hints to the 611 commandments that were given to us by Moshe. "תּוֹרָה" is the numerical value of 611. The first two commandments, "Anochi" and "Lo Yiheye LeCha" were said by G-d. So we are saying, if G-d had only given us the first two commandments on Mount Sinai, and not given us the other 611 (numerical value of Torah), it would have been enough. This fits in nicely with the Ba'al HaTanya's statement (Tanya Chapter 20 and Chapters 24 - based on the Shaloh beg. Parshat Yitro and Zohar II, p. 276a.) that "Anochi" inlcudes all the positive commandments and "There shall be no other gods before you" includes all negative commandments, since doing a Mitzvah affirms G-d's unity and transgressing any commandment is essentially denying G-d's unity. In the Haggadah Shel Pesach Im Likutei Ta'amim U'Minhagim, The Lubavitcher Rebbe gives two answers:
|
||||
|
|
|
We still would have been a nation, and then could have formed our own set of ethical laws. That seems to have worked out well for the Greeks around the same time. B"H we got the Torah instead, and have since long outlasted our secular contemporaries. |
|||||||
|
|
Rav Leuchter in his second shiur on the Hagodo says that at the time of Har Sinai “posku zuhamosom” Klal Yisroel went back (admittedly for a short time) to the state of Adam before he sinned. That would have been enough (reason to be grateful to Him). |
|||||
|
|
HaSeder Haruch (vol. 3, Iyunim Behagada pg. 414) collects ten explanations (some of them may overlap answers already posted, but I nonetheless bring the whole list for sake of completeness and because they are well sourced):
|
||||
|
|