Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Monica asked an excellent question about how to correct someone who posts something objectionable on a public forum. I was struck by the suggestion that the usual course of action was "to take the person aside for a private conversation". That's sensible advice and (once you hear it) maybe a bit obvious. But it's also what we Christians are commanded to do.

So I got to wondering: Is this a case of convergent evolution (so to speak) or is this model of reconciliation found in the Tanach? Or would the early Christians have heard it from their rabbis?

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers 2

up vote 11 down vote accepted

Very conveniently, the answer lies plainly in one verse. VaYikra (Leviticus) 19:17 states, "Do not hate your brother in your heart; you surely must rebuke your neighbor, but you must not bear sin because of him." (My own translation)

Rashi there states: "but You shall not bear a sin on his account: I.e., [in the course of your rebuking your fellow,] do not embarrass him in public. — [Torath Kohanim 19:43; Arachin 16b]" (translation from here)

share|improve this answer
add comment

Torah says:

You shall surely admonish your fellow, but don't bear a sin because of him.

Which is interpreted as:

Even when it's necessary to admonish someone, do so in such a way that you won't bear the sin of embarrassing him publicly.

share|improve this answer
    
Is the first quote Leviticus 19:17? Leviticus 19:18 works too, if you think through how you would prefer to be rebuked or admonished. –  Jon Ericson Feb 17 '12 at 2:32
3  
Yes, it's Lev. 19:17. –  msh210 Feb 17 '12 at 2:44
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.