Monica asked an excellent question about how to correct someone who posts something objectionable on a public forum. I was struck by the suggestion that the usual course of action was "to take the person aside for a private conversation". That's sensible advice and (once you hear it) maybe a bit obvious. But it's also what we Christians are commanded to do.

So I got to wondering: Is this a case of convergent evolution (so to speak) or is this model of reconciliation found in the Tanach? Or would the early Christians have heard it from their rabbis?

link|improve this question
feedback

2 Answers

up vote 10 down vote accepted

Very conveniently, the answer lies plainly in one verse. VaYikra (Leviticus) 19:17 states, "Do not hate your brother in your heart; you surely must rebuke your neighbor, but you must not bear sin because of him." (My own translation)

Rashi there states: "but You shall not bear a sin on his account: I.e., [in the course of your rebuking your fellow,] do not embarrass him in public. — [Torath Kohanim 19:43; Arachin 16b]" (translation from here)

link|improve this answer
feedback

Torah says:

You shall surely admonish your fellow, but don't bear a sin because of him.

Which is interpreted as:

Even when it's necessary to admonish someone, do so in such a way that you won't bear the sin of embarrassing him publicly.

link|improve this answer
Is the first quote Leviticus 19:17? Leviticus 19:18 works too, if you think through how you would prefer to be rebuked or admonished. – Jon Ericson Feb 17 at 2:32
3  
Yes, it's Lev. 19:17. – msh210 Feb 17 at 2:44
feedback

Your Answer

 
or
required, but never shown

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.