Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

We know that it is permitted, in self-defense, to kill one who is trying to kill you, and I have heard that this applies to other people too (I see someone trying to kill someone else and I intervene). Is it ever permissible to kill an attacking person to defend one's animals? (For an attacking animal, see here.)

Presumably in the case of livestock the answer is no (he pays the value of the animal); suppose it is instead a prized, expensive racing horse, or a trained seeing-eye dog (trained for that specific person), or a beloved pet. Does everything non-human fall into the "property, thus financial settlement" category, or is it more complicated?

share|improve this question
    
Prompted by this, though maybe a day late? –  Monica Cellio Jan 6 '12 at 2:36
add comment

2 Answers

Lethal force is only authorized for the civilian bystander to prevent a rape or a murder. Not property damage. This assumes that whoever's attacking my property has a big sign on his forehead that says I'm here just to damage property and I definitely won't hurt any people.

The reason that we acquit someone who kills a home intruder is we assume the robber was prepared to kill the homeowner if needed. One contemporary rabbi actually was home at a time when most people wouldn't be, and found someone breaking in (who beat a hasty retreat). This robber was not prepared to use violence (he figured it would be an empty house), so the rabbi was not authorized to use any force (not that he likely would have anyhow).

Per Alex's answer on the above question, if your animal is attacked by another animal in a neutral space (or it invades your yard), if the only way to save your animal is to damage the attacking one, you aren't held liable. Thus I'd presume property is property. Of course we could have the funny case of a million-dollar throroughbred attacking my, Idunno, sixty-cent goldfish, and some evil genius has constructed a machine whereby if I don't push the button, it kills my goldfish; if I do push the button, it kills the horse; and those are my only two options -- save myself sixty cents, or cost the other guy a million dollars. As far as I know, strictly speaking if you pushed the button we can't charge you -- people panic when their property is threatened -- but I'd strongly assume meta-halacha would recommend that you don't.

share|improve this answer
2  
Could you add a source for your first paragraph? –  Monica Cellio Jan 23 '12 at 13:23
add comment

The following is from the Mishna (Sanhedrin 8:7):

ואלו הן שמצילין אותן בנפשן: הרודף אחר חברו להרגו, אחר הזכור ואחר הנערה המארסה. אבל הרודף אחר הבהמה, והמחלל את השבת, והעובד עבודה זרה - אין מצילין אותן בנפשן

These are the ones whom you may save with their lives [ie: these are the situations in which you may kill the pursuer]: one who is chasing after one's friend to kill him, [and one who is chasing] after a boy or after a betrothed girl [in order to have sexual intercourse with them, acc. to the gemara].

However, one who is chasing after an animal, [after] one who violates the Shabbat, or [after] one who worships idolatry - one does not save them with their [the pursuers'] lives.

share|improve this answer
1  
The case there is where he is chasing after an animal to rape it (parallel to the maiden case, but since there is no real victim we don't kill the pursuer). –  Double AA Jul 15 '12 at 15:05
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.