Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Inspired by this question on Biblical Hermeneutics.

What were the Nephilim mentioned in Bereishis and in Bamidbar?

Bereishis 6:1-4

The Nephilim were in the earth in those days, and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bore children to them; the same were the mighty men that were of old, the men of renown.

Bamidbar 13:33

And there we saw the Nephilim, the sons of Anak, who come of the Nephilim; and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.'

Which commentaries speak about it?

share|improve this question
Better question: Which commentaries do not speak about it? – jake Dec 14 '11 at 17:33
see this question: judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/8382/… – Menachem Dec 14 '11 at 17:47
@Jake, I know; this is little bit of a public service question. – HodofHod Dec 14 '11 at 18:34
Based on some recent discoveries,( nytimes.com/2010/05/07/science/07neanderthal.html ) some (Such as the TV show The Naked Archeologist) have thought that the Neffilim might have been Neadnrathals. – avi Dec 14 '11 at 19:54
up vote 6 down vote accepted

Genesis 6:4

ד) הַנְּפִלִים הָיוּ בָאָרֶץ בַּיָּמִים הָהֵם וְגַם אַחֲרֵי כֵן אֲשֶׁר יָבֹאוּ בְּנֵי הָאֱלֹהִים אֶל בְּנוֹת הָאָדָם וְיָלְדוּ לָהֶם הֵמָּה הַגִּבֹּרִים אֲשֶׁר מֵעוֹלָם אַנְשֵׁי הַשֵּׁם:

Rashi, Ibn Ezra, Radak, Ramban (quoting Rashi and Radak), Chizkuni, and Malbim (on Genesis 8:21) all say that they were giants (ענקים). This interpretation is probably based on the only other place where the Nephilim are mentioned, Numbers 13:33, which states

וְשָׁם רָאִינוּ אֶת הַנְּפִילִים בְּנֵי עֲנָק מִן הַנְּפִלִים וַנְּהִי בְעֵינֵינוּ כַּחֲגָבִים וְכֵן הָיִינוּ בְּעֵינֵיהֶם:

Why were they called that? Ibn Ezra and Radak explain that

"ופירוש נפילים שיפול לב הרואה אותם, שיתמה מגובה קומתם."

Ramban and Abarbanel explain that they were the children of the בני האלוהים and בנות האדם.

Ibn Ezra (in his alternate commentary) explains that they were the "opposite of the גבורים" mentioned in that verse. (I'm not sure what that means.)

The פנים יפות (R. Pinchas son of R. Zvi Hirsh haLevi Horowitz, 1700's) says that they were "fallen angels." The תורה תמימה (R. Baruch Epstein, 1900's) says similarly, that they are "those that fell from heaven to earth."

(Please note that "fallen angels," while making first appearance in the Book of Enoch, an ancient Jewish book written in the 1st century BCE, were greatly popularized in Milton's Paradise Lost, published in 1667. As such, it's plausible that these last two commentaries were influenced by Paradise Lost.)

share|improve this answer
Ibn Ezra's comment means that the Nefilim were "lowly people", people of unimportance, aka "the mob" while the givurim were the important people, the "upper classmen" – avi Dec 15 '11 at 9:13

The Pirkei D'Rav Eliezer says these were angels that fell from heaven and married the daughters of Kayin who were dressed inappropriately, and had children that were giants.



share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.