Tell me more ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.
up vote 5 down vote favorite

I am after a source that allows one to treat one's house as all within four amos l'chatchila, with respect to nagel vasser (hand washing in the morning).

share|improve this question
2  
I did some dejargonification, but this could still use some clarification of what the issue is. – Isaac Moses Dec 1 '11 at 15:34
one must wash their hands upon arising in the morning. a lot of seforim say that one must wash within 4 amos (aprox 6ft) of their bed. There is another opinion from the gemorah in berochos that allows one to consider his whole house as halachicaly daled amos and meerly needs to go to the nearest sink. I am after a source in the poskim that allows this view as an as acceptable view and not only a good alternative in a difficult situation. – Moshe Yitzhak Dec 1 '11 at 15:39
1  
Moshe, please edit the post to include as much information as would be relevant to an answerer, and please try to follow this jargon guideline as much as possible. – Isaac Moses Dec 1 '11 at 16:02
1  
...Thus, for example, the question might read "When arising in the morning, one must wash his hands before he walks four amos (cubits) ([citation to some halachic authority]). I [have heard? assume based on what people do? ...] that one may treat his entire house as all withing four amos, and am after a source that says so.". – msh210♦ Dec 1 '11 at 21:34
Moshe Yitzhak, are you looking for a contemporary source, or the source for the logic? – YDK Dec 1 '11 at 22:47
show 2 more comments

2 Answers

up vote 9 down vote

The Mishna Brura in OC 1 says:

י"א דלענין זה אמרינן כולא ביתא כד' אמות דמי אבל אין לסמוך ע"ז כ"א בשעת הדחק.

"There are those who say that with regard to this (washing hands), we say that the entire house is as 4 amos (cubits), but one should only rely on this when forced."

The Aruch HaShulchan in OC 4 says:

מפני שיש מחמירים ומזהירים ע"פ הזוהר שאסור לילך ד' אמות בלא נט"י

"Because there are those who are stringent and are careful acc. to the Zohar that it is forbidden to walk 4 amos without washing the hands."

Rav Avigdor Nebenzahl, in his commentary on Mishna Brurah, "Beyitzchak Yikarei" quotes an oral tradition from his rebbe, Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach, that goes back to the Gra that all Ruach Ra (evil spirits) of the Zohar were batel (nullified) after the killing of Avraham ben Avraham the Ger ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avraham_ben_Avraham See also the paragraph starting "It is" in the wikipedia article.) Thus according to this there is no need to quickly wash one's hands in the morning because there is no Ruach Ra on them.

share|improve this answer
@MosheYitzhak I edited to add another idea. – Double AA♦ Dec 1 '11 at 15:58
Thanks that is an idea I have been told and searching for another source. – Moshe Yitzhak Dec 1 '11 at 16:00
2  
Guys, welcome to the site. You've both made several contributions over the last couple of weeks and we're all the better for it. But can you please, please remember that your information is only useful to those who can read and understand it. Please translate as much as possible and cut down on the jargon. This is a website for everyone. Thanks! – Seth J Dec 1 '11 at 16:15
up vote 2 down vote

The real question is- what is the significance of 4 amos?

The Ran (Mes. Shabbos, 31b in the Ran "Vehamotzi...") says that the reason why transferring >4 cubits in a public domain is not mentioned in the mishna as a major melacha is that it is merely an offshoot of "motzi"- transferring from a private to a public domain. Since a person in a public domain has an halachic ownership of a surrounding 4 amos, every 4 amos is considered a different domain. One who carries more than 4 amos accomplishes the same as a "motzi".

So walking >4 amos w/o washing may be less of an issue of measurement and more of place: Don't leave your domain without washing. >4 cubit inside a house would not be an issue.

share|improve this answer
2  
While your logic may be impeccable — I, for one, can't pecc it — the question asked for a source. – msh210♦ Dec 1 '11 at 21:36
@msh210, I was assuming that the questioner knew, for example, Double AA's mishna berura, but wants the makor for saying such logic. Perhaps you are right that he has heard the halacha and wasnts to know where he can find it in print. – YDK Dec 1 '11 at 22:46

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.