Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Why in the case of Lo Matzti Libitcha Bisolen in Makkot does a husband only get Makkot and pay shouldn't he get Kasher Zamam and be killed just like what would have happened to his wife.

share|improve this question
    
Hey yoo, Welcome to mi.yodeya, and thanks very much for all the participation! I think that this question is probably in fulfillment of lo.yodeya.com/2010/01/guidelines-jargon.html , given its specialized nature, but it might be worthwhile for you to expand on some of the terms anyway. –  Isaac Moses Apr 25 '10 at 23:13
add comment

1 Answer

If you're referring to the Biblical case of "motzee shem ra": Deuteronomy 22:13--19; see Rabbi Kaplan's translation and notes, The Rambam explains (in Hilchos Na'ara Besula 3:6) that the case is in fact that the husband has two witnesses falsely testify against his wife; the witnesses are indeed "zamam"-ified and potentially executed.

The husband arranged for false witnesses but never took the stand as a witness himself. (He'd be disqualified as a relative anyhow.) Hence he can't be executed; only flogged and fined.

The Gemara points out that in any case where Person A hires Person B to do something evil (such as murder or being a false witness), it's Person B who takes most of the culpability. to paraphrase the Gemara, "I was just following orders" is nice, but he should have followed Divine orders before Person A's.

share|improve this answer
    
Just to clarify: the only way she could be killed is if there was testimony of her consenting infidelity while she was betrothed. –  Shalom Apr 26 '10 at 14:07
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.