Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is there any suggestion in the scripture (even implicitly) that King David might have been also a Navi?

share|improve this question

4 Answers 4

up vote 13 down vote accepted

Whether or not David was a navi seems be an age-old discussion among Jewish authorities.

On the one hand, there seem to be many futuristic concepts throughout Tehillim, especially about the destruction of the Temple and the eventual redemption. Assuming that David was the author of at least most of the psalms would imply that he had at least some form of prophecy.

On the other hand, though, we don't ever find that God "spoke" to David as he did to other prophets. In fact, when God wanted to give David a direct message, it was sent either by Gad HaChozeh or Nassan HaNavi. This implies that David himself, at least at that time, was not a navi.

As @msh210 pointed out, Chazal count David in their list of Neviim. Rambam, however, believes that he was not really a full-fledged navi. (See here. And here)

To find out what different people belive about David's prophetic status, a good place to look is the commentaries at the beginning of Sefer Tehillim. It is there in Ibn Ezra's introduction that you will find a list of sources in which the scipture "suggests" that David indeed was a navi. (The context there is actually sources that imply David as the author of all of Tehillim.) To give you the first couple:

  • "כִּי כֵן מִצְוַת דָּוִיד אִישׁ הָאֱלֹהִים" [A description we find only by neviim.] (II Divrei Hayamim 8:14)
  • "רוּחַ יְהוָה דִּבֶּר בִּי וּמִלָּתוֹ עַל לְשׁוֹנִי" (II Shmuel 23:2)

See Ibn Ezra there; also Radak and Meiri.

share|improve this answer
    
Does anyone else know the source from R' Avraham ben HaRambam? I was just looking for it. Almost positive I read it in this sefer, but now I can't find it. –  jake Nov 18 '11 at 6:22
1  
Umm, God talks directly to King David and tells him not to build his temple. He also gives him the vision of a sword going over Jeruslem... Tehilim however are not Nevuah, they are part of Ketuvim. –  avi Nov 18 '11 at 10:16
1  
@avi, people who believe David is not a navi will tell you that God told David not to build the Temple not directly, but rather through a navi. Also, nevuos may be written in Kesuvim. See the Meiri link. –  jake Nov 18 '11 at 10:31
    
The vision of the sword is fairly explicit. –  avi Nov 18 '11 at 10:34
    
@avi, Forgive me, but what are you referring to with the vision of the sword? His vision of the malach hamashchis at the end of sefer Shmuel, or something else? –  jake Nov 18 '11 at 10:41

Whether David was a navi seems to be a machloket between the Rambam in his earlier writings and the Rambam in his later writings. In Shmonah prakim, the Rambam's introduction to Avot, ch. 7, he counts Shlomo and David as Nevi'im. However, in the Moreh Nevuchim, II:45, he says that they are not nevi'im but possessors of ruach ha-kodesh. However, both Rashi and Rabbenu Chananel in Megillah 14a count David (even if R. Chananel doesn't count Shlomo). The Rambam also adduces various proofs, e.g., in the Moreh, he counters an argument from שמואל ב', כ"ג, ג ואילו דברי דוד: אמר אלהי ישֹראל, לי דִבר צור ישֹראל, משמעותם שהוא הבטיח לו על-ידי נביא, או נתן או זולתו, כמו ויאמר ה' לה

share|improve this answer
    
Could the differences between Rambam's introduction to Avot and his position in Moreh Nevuchim be attributed to either censors or a printer's error in either book? –  Bruce James Jan 10 '13 at 16:45

Although David uses a navi to find out what Hashem wants(Natan) there is also some thought that David is a Navi in his own right. It appears that he uses Natan and others to find out what Hashem thinks about David's life, giving him parables to correct David's behavior while David speaks directly to Hashem in regard to war and the government.

share|improve this answer
2  
A source for this assertion would be valuable. Or, if there's no source, then evidence (you say "[i]t appears": where does it appear?). –  msh210 Nov 18 '11 at 17:45

Yes, there is.

I know this because he's listed among the forty-eight prophets.

However, I don't know where that suggestion is.

share|improve this answer
1  
A non-constructive proof. :-) –  msh210 Nov 18 '11 at 2:26
    
It's in Melachim when Gd talks to King David. –  avi Nov 18 '11 at 10:17

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.