Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

A few members of a community board in Manhattan do not want to give permission for a Sukka in a park (because of 1st amendment issues).

According to the Shulchan Aruch Harav, one cannot make a blessing in a stolen Sukkah. So if the board would end up forbidding the Sukka (and win on appeal), yet someone were to put one up, would one be able to make a blessing in that Sukka?

What if the shul wouldn't have asked, and the police wouldn't have noticed, then would the Sukkah still stay kosher?

Relevent question: Sukkah in the Soviet Union

share|improve this question

A sukkah gezulah means the sukkah itself is stolen, not the land that its on. If someone holds even using land without permission is gezulah so then it would be a problem here too. Either way, its probably a chilul haShem to go build something in public without permission.

share|improve this answer
Look in Syif 11 where the Shulchan Aruch Harav says that one cannot lchatchila build a sukka in public domain (and even bdieved one cannot say a bracha on such a sukka) because the ground is stolen from the public. – Shmuel Brin Oct 4 '11 at 22:20

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.